At a glance Stake concentration at a glance. Continent split, round-trip latency from our Prague server, the countries that hold the stake, and the hosting ASNs underneath them. No single provider is dominant, but provider diversity is shallower than the country map suggests.
Stake by continent
Latency from Prague
Stake-weighted median ICMP round-trip from our Prague server, by continent.
Top countries by stake
Provider concentration
33% BFT line
The 1/3 line is where a correlated failure across one provider starts to threaten BFT liveness.
Blast radius — largest correlated-failure domain vs the 1/3 line
The 1/3 BFT line is where a single correlated failure can halt the chain. No single provider or country crosses it — but one legal jurisdiction does.
Network signals
An automatic read of this snapshot — the concentration, geography, and latency risks worth watching, straight from the aggregates above.
- Loading …
World Map
Each bubble is a city/datacenter location. Size = share of total stake hosted there. Color = round-trip latency to that location from our Prague server. Click a bubble for node count, stake share, latency, and the hosting providers in that location. Locations only — no individual validators.
Interactive map could not load. The breakdown below has the same data.
Top countries by stake
Country spread looks healthy on its own, but a lot of this country diversity collapses back onto the same few hosting ASNs.
| Top provider (in-country) | Country | Stake | Nodes | RTT from JP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading … | ||||
Trends over time
How the stake geography is shifting. History accumulates from our snapshots — one point per day.